Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...
Allan, P and Bryant, M (2014) The attributes of resilience: A tool in the evaluation and design of earthquake-prone cities. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 109-29.
Baroudi, B and Rapp, R R (2014) Stakeholder management in disaster restoration projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 182-93.
Bichard, E and Thurairajah, N (2014) Trialling behaviour change strategies to motivate interest in property level flood protection. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 130-43.
Charlesworth, E and Fien, J (2014) Breaching the urban contract: Lessons from post disaster reconstruction from research on five divided cities. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 194-201.
MacKee, J, Askland, H H and Askew, L (2014) Recovering cultural built heritage after natural disasters: A resilience perspective. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 202-12.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Built heritage conservation; Built heritage protection; Cultural built heritage; Disaster resilience; Natural disasters; Post-disaster reconstruction
- ISBN/ISSN: 1759-5908
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-09-2012-0032
- Abstract:
Purpose – This paper aims to propose an alternative strategy for preparing, recovering and conserving cultural built heritage (CBH) in the context of natural disasters. It presents the idea that disaster preparedness is integral to CBH protection and conservation. Design/methodology/approach – Building upon a review of existing scholarship on CBH, resilience and disaster management, a conceptual model is proposed to assist key stakeholders preparing for the recovery of CBH after natural disasters. It is argued that the protection and recovery of CBH in the wake of natural disasters require a holistic approach and that the theoretical framework of resilience thinking can support such an approach. Findings – The paper discusses how the process of adaptive cycles has a role to play in the development of a holistic understanding of the conservation process. It proposes an adaptive cycle model that is supported by four critical factors: reordering, conserving, shifting and transforming. Originality/value – Through exploration of systems thinking and resilience theory, the research presented in this paper explores a new approach to the conceptualisation of CBH. The paper presents the first stage of a research project that aims to develop strategies that can support the protection and recovery of CBH in the wake of natural disasters. The proposed model represents a holistic approach for reconceptualising CBH and may, as such, have potential implications that extend from the field of post-disaster recovery into the domain of CBH conservation and protection.
Syed, A and Routray, J K (2014) Vulnerability assessment of earthquake prone communities in Baluchistan. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 144-62.
Tucker, S, Gamage, A and Wijeyesekera, C (2014) Some design aspects of sustainable post-disaster housing. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(02), 163-81.